?The common sense that a little bit knows some calculator, can see this must be third-grade newspaper
Of false news.Compute confidential can kill people, must there is a hand just going first, (the technical term of expert calls "performance organization")
But the calculator playing chess is to don't need a hand, as long as show on the screen that the chess bureau is then.I also saw this new
Smell, say that the calculator chases an electricity to in the keyboard, die the opponent electricity.But want to make the matter like this may take place, first
Keyboard(all of the keyboards in nowadays are plasticses of, don't conduct electricity) that need to be designed and conducted electricity, then arrive the key to the strong electricity
On the dish, also need to add a switch, and let the calculator control this switch.All of all theses are the calculations with no hand
The machine cans not do it of, only the person cans make.So if really there is matter like this, also can be "the person is homicidal", but
It isn't "the calculator kills people".The robot contains hand, so can kill people in principle, the industrial robot "kill people"
Of the affairs really once appeared, but that is the control system of robot to be subjected to interference, occurrence mistake action, hold to get alone with others
Member according to very crowded on the wall, the trouble of the property equal to and common machine of affairs, the robot didn't kill people
Of"motive".
Ask:
The robot in nowadays didn't°yet any"motive", but future of those than person intelligent robot
Dissimilarity.Till then wait, science writer moxa Sa gram& amp;#183;West Mo Fu in 1950 at its work 《I, robot 》
Is medium to put forward famously Be getting more dated for we afterwards person receiving for the robot of the model three lawses probably.Robot
Three lawses are:First laws, the robot can not hurt a person as well as stand by with folded arms when the person suffer from injury;
Two lawses, the robot should obey the person's whole orders, but can not breach first laws;Third laws, robot
The safety that should protect an oneself, but can not breach the first, second laws.These three lawses more probably drive robot
Tear agreement unilaterally.Because once the robot is similar to others to have feelings, thinking, reason logically and intelligence, even
Is more more intelligent than person, meeting than person more work in calculate and selfish.Thus, underneath of an in the fierce competition ages of
The popular story has to rewrite.
The edition at first is two people to walk in the forest, met a tiger.1 squats down down to fasten shoelace,
What does the person of flank say to by this time fasten shoelace to still have to use?The one who fasten shoelace says that my fastenning good shoelace only can once run you
It Be getting more useful.But the robot and others is in the forest stroll, also met a tiger.The robot will consider,
What robot can not hurt a person, see the ghost going!In front of benefits, protect ego first.Robot also need not fasten
Shoelace, it first will person a clench, send to dangerous spot, say, you manage to pool first to eat this person, I am again
Seeking for you is more tasty, finish saying oneself escaped first.
Answer:
This kind of parlance exists a mistake area:The thinking more intelligent person is more selfish, this is that the milli- is groundless.At we
In the daily life must also not"regulation" like this, those most selfish persons aren't exactly big cleverness, not know with
Then person's cooperation can acquire a greater benefits.The nature choice regulation that the living creature evolves' making living creature is an all selfish gene
Of performance, so all the man's natural characters of the living creatures is being all one is selfish, for all that, but the intelligence of the living creature has a sky the Rang
It do not, this also explains selfish isn't related with intelligence.
Robot three lawses this parlance isn't fitting, these are three not is natural"laws", also not is a machine
The person signs with others of"agreement", but our manufacturing robot give the behavior standard of robot rules, can also
To see into a set of value.Certainly this standard just general but talk about, if someone wants to design robot to used for
The war is about to change into the type of "do not hurt an oneself person, hurt enemy".This robot very Wei
Insurance, design certainly plus multiple and safe measure, so as not to it drops to turn gun muzzle to beat himself/herself, positive if want to the soldier
Training him to absolutely obey orders is similar.
The robot will also have a certain degree of"selfish" as the evaluation standard for studying, for example as far as possible economy ability
Measure.But compare with mankind, its selfish degree will be a lot of inferior to.Like this and presumably have several logical arrangements from:
A, the person is the outcome of evolution, the performance of selfish gene, the meaning of its existence is existence oneself, but machine
The machine person is what person is a person to design, the meaning of its existence is behavior but existence of, acquire more knowledge.The second,
The person is an animal, subjected to check and supervision of a lot of biologies, but robot then nonexistent this check and supervision.For example, life
Belong to a person to only have once, so the persons(and the whole animals) will offer the own life of the utmost effort protection,
"I" am unique;But to robot, these control nonexistent, machine can free replication
Oneself is like Sun Wukong to pull out a to become a thousands he or she of milli- hairs and take up a post duty the completion is behind again synthesize 1,
Collect to arrive the knowledge respectively learning together;The person's brains impossibly and****Separate, but the robot can chase a brain
The bag puts in a certain calculator and passes the body that the breadth takes net control the spot, the body "die in an accident" and changed again a
Be, change a clothes like us,beats by dre uk, even can choose "body" of different structure according to the different task;
Robot of"I" of the concept have with mankind very different, mankind of"I" is constant from cradle to the grave, can not divide
Match of, robot of"I" can according to task temporary set set up of, can share because of the knowledge of the robot,
The new information that all each robots acquire knows to all put in a huge common knowledge base and be to need to be completed particular
Task, can need to win election to take knowledge and career according to the task from the knowledge base, the set sets up a robot, task
Complete behind learn of the new information know, new experience join knowledge base, "I" arrive this end.Can produce at any time so
Living, perish at any time of"I", there is certainly no too selfish reason.
So the story of that tiger for the nothing important truth, the body of robot is metal and plastics product, tiger
Can't eat, have no reason to escape;Even if out of order,can repair or replace very conveniently;But it if think
Good method to save a person, become valuable knowledge, be loaded in knowledge base, make own a part get eternal life,
Why should not be happy to do it.
Ask:
If the intelligence robot was free from mankind to control and how did?They probably the mankind of Cuan Duo at on the earth
Of governance position, chase mankind also be become general of the animal treat.
Answer:
The phrase " control" can never together level ascend comprehension.Take air condition machine to do example, if an air condition machine
There is no auto control function, only a switch, we felt hot and then open air condition and felt cold
Close, air condition completely under ours "control"s, but the air condition like this is used is troublesome.
Related articles:
没有评论:
发表评论